← All solutions
Reasoning Verification
Step-by-step verification of math, code, and logic.
Domain experts mark which steps in a chain-of-thought are valid and which break, producing the process-reward signal frontier reasoning models need.
Per-step process-reward annotation
Worqgrid's reasoning annotator splits a chain-of-thought into atomic steps. Reviewers mark each one as correct, flawed, or unverifiable, and explain why.
- → Auto-segmentation of model traces into discrete steps
- → Per-step verdict with rationale text
- → Optional final-answer correctness check
- → Export as PRM / ORM training pairs
Problem
Find ∫ x²·sin(x) dx using integration by parts.
-
step 1 · Set u = x², dv = sin(x) dx.Correct
-
step 2 · Then du = 2x dx, v = −cos(x).Correct
-
step 3 · So ∫x²sin(x) dx = −x²cos(x) + 2∫x·cos(x) dx.Flawed
-
step 4 · …Pending
For the domains where every step matters
Mathematics
Olympiad-level proofs, calculus, linear algebra, verified by PhDs.
Code & algorithms
Step-level checks for correctness, complexity claims, and edge cases.
Logic & formal reasoning
Predicate logic, set theory, and proof-style argument verification.
Quantitative finance & physics
Domain-specific reasoning audits with unit and dimensional checks.